Glancing at a wikipedia article about cut-ups, I ran into an interesting idea. Coined by the CrimethInc. collective in their book, Recipes for Disaster: An Anarchist Cookbook, behavioural cut-ups are a method of changing one's life by performing activities which are thought to cut up two socially acceptable, mundane behaviours and combining them to form a creative, amusing activity.
Although we specifically cut up language by physically cutting paper and rearanging fourths of pages and copying and pasting on plurk, these class activities are merely symbols of the greater cut-up structure of our nanotext class. Even The Ticket that Exploded, while intrinsically valuable, is merely a vehicle to illustrate the overall class concept.
Specifically, the class cut up the elements of time, space, and leadership hierarchy to question the arbitrary social norms within academia.
From the begining of class, Doctor Prichard told us that he wanted class to exist outside of the specified time frames of Mondays, Wednessdays, and Fridays from 1:00 to 2:20 PM. By providing blog and plurk assignments, he has encouraged us to communicate with each other when ispiration strikes, regardless of the time of day. By taking class communication outside of chosen time frame, Nanotext has cut up our typical homework behavior with our classroom discussion behavior to question the existing educational paradigm and propose a new learning tool.
Additionally, Doctor Prichard frequently questioned the space where we hold our tri-weekly class meetings. He encouraged us to look for other spaces to have class, searched buildings to see if other rooms would be available, and suspended his voice for a day to have class via plurk. Each of these statements and activities forced us to question our notion of environmental constantcy for class activities and cut up the spaces for our class, our homework, and our everyday lives.
Perhaps most importantly, Doctor Prichard is trying to cut up his own profession. By generating reasons for students to come to the front of the room, allowing students to guide the class discussion, and openly questioning the teacher-student relationship, Doctor Prichard is helping to cut up our categories of teachers and students, and the roles that individuals should play in college.
Although cutting paper and copying and pasting to create language cut ups is significantly interesting, behavioral cut ups are the most salient tool for our class to open the acedmic box.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You make an interesting point with this, Paul.
ReplyDeleteAs we saw today, Tony is still very much cutting up our learning experience. We've shifted our focus a little today and created a much more intimate, personal space by arranging ourselves in a circle at the back of the room.
From what I've seen on plurk and just watching people's reactions, we're still adjusting to this difference from the formal educational system.
Because we're so cultured to that system of guidance and having a direct leader to follow, being placed in this almost Socratic Discussion kind of setting leaves us lost.
I think it was Grace (http://www.plurk.com/GraceDaily aka GreyGoo) who said "it is starting to feel like a support group as opposed to a class"
I agree with her in that we lose the topic of discussion rather easily as we build off each other and the conversation continues, but I disagree to the extent that it is still beneficial conversation to have. Most of what we talked about today can still be applied to the books, it just wasn't in context of the conversation itself. In other words, we are being made to apply it on our own terms, in our own way outside of the specified time frames for class.
We're further allowing ourselves to be cut up, when we can just as easily guide the conversation ourselves and meet that end.
Two points:
ReplyDelete1) About is a tricky preposition
2) There is no "t" in my last name
Sorry for taking so long to change your last name. I forgot to check the comments on this post. I need to get away from spelling words or names like I say them. For one, I don't always pronounce words correctly. And the english language is rarely phonetic anyways.
ReplyDelete